Home Entertainment News George Lucas Questions The Use Of Practical Sets In Other Directors’ Films

George Lucas Questions The Use Of Practical Sets In Other Directors’ Films

HOLLYWOOD sign on blue sky background. World famous landmark. USA. Los Angeles, California. 09-11-2012. - Image (Mulevich / Shutterstock.com)

Key Takeaways:
– Famous George Lucas expresses concern about the overemphasis on practical sets in contemporary sci-fi .
– Despite the popularity of using practical sets by directors Christopher Nolan and , Lucas views them as a distraction from the core story.
– Lucas' comments could potentially upset of Nolan and Villeneuve, given their directors' prevalent use of practical sets.

Underlying the Grandeur of

At the heart of the glamorous -making industry, the unsung heroes aren't just the directors, actors, and writers. Production designers, too, hold vital ground, creating the magic of a fantasy world that transports audiences into an entirely new and different realm. But on this issue, the accolades for practical sets stop when we reach creator, George Lucas.

George Lucas on Practical Sets

Lucas, a celebrated filmmaker and the maestro behind the Wars franchise, is known for his innovative approach in moviemaking. However, his views on practical sets go against the grain of today's popular thinking in the industry.

Remember his interview during Return of the Jedi? It was there he first shared his straightforward views concerning contemporary sci-fi directors' use of practical sets. He praised their positive intentions, yet raised concerns that they might be overestimating its importance.

So, what was Lucas actually getting at?

Lucas seems to view the use of practical sets as merely decorative — something directors use to highlight their hard in movie production. In today's era dominated by CGI and visual effects, Lucas argues that less emphasis should be placed on set decoration and more on the central narrative.

Among all, he emphasized that constructing detailed settings could distract directors from developing compelling plotlines. He cautioned that spending too much time and effort on creating these environments might just be overspending, slowing down the pace of the films.

Impacts on Current Directors

These views, decades old, are gaining new attention today due to the works of modern directors Christopher Nolan and Denis Villeneuve.

Both Nolan and Villeneuve are popular in the sci-fi genre and well-loved by fans around the world. Their name itself are synonymous with intricate practical sets that lend a realistic touch to their films.

Denis Villeneuve gave us a thorough taste of his craft in Dune: Part Two. Teaming up with production designer Patrice Vermette, he created the grand city of Arrakis. Drawing architectural influences from everywhere, including World War 2 bunkers and Mayan Temples, no stone was left unturned in making Arrakis come to life.

In a similar vein, Christopher Nolan's latest offering, Oppenheimer, credits Ruth De Jong for production design. To maintain an aesthetic accurate to the 1940s era, they built a full-size set of the entire town of Los Alamos after scouting multiple locations.

Back to Lucas' Criticisms

Despite these well-regarded efforts by Nolan and Villeneuve, Lucas's criticism may trigger an upheaval among their dedicated fan base. Lucas's admonition — that directors are losing sight of storytelling in favor of enhancing visual elements — could be seen as a direct criticism of Nolan and Villeneuve's approach.

While Lucas's preference for a greater on storytelling than on practical sets is clear, it will be interesting to see how this discourse develops. Will Lucas's criticisms lead to a larger industry shift, or will directors like Nolan and Villeneuve continue to create their masterpieces in their own signature styles? Only time will tell.

The good news? Audiences don't have to choose. They can enjoy Star Wars, Dune, and Oppenheimer, appreciating different approaches to movie-making.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version